mary saw two boys swimming across a river she knew had a deep and dangerous channel. she did not warn the boys or try to stop them. if one of the boys had been injured, could mary be sued for negligence? a. yes, the danger to the boys was foreseeable. b. yes, she owed them an enforceable moral duty. c. yes, all adults have a duty of care to all minors. d. no, mary had no duty of care to the boys.

Question

contestada

Respuesta :

akankshasharma92 akankshasharma92 · Answer 1 · 2022-11-30T04:34:20+01:00

According to the given information, No, because Mary had no duty of care to the boys.

Tort actions, or civil cases, include negligence cases. A legal wrong is simply described as a "tort." According to negligence law, you can file a lawsuit against a person for any harm they unintentionally or recklessly caused you. When someone behaves carelessly or fails to act with reasonable diligence, this is considered negligence.
Ordinary or gross behaviors are the two categories into which negligent behavior typically falls.
Ordinary negligence is defined as "a person failing to exercise reasonable care, which results in harm to another." Ordinary negligence, for instance, would be for a driver to ignore a stop sign.
However, "gross negligence involves more than just carelessness. It denotes a blatant disregard or lack of concern for other people's safety.

Learn more about Ordinary negligence, here

https://brainly.com/question/14752831

#SPJ4