Respuesta :
A right parenthesis ) is missing from this problem statement. I'm assuming that you meant
3 1/2+( 2+4 1/2).
There are at least two ways in which you could do this problem. One would be to simply drop the parentheses entirely:
3 1/2+ 2+4 1/2 It'd make sense to add 3 1/2 and 4 1/2 together FIRST, and then to add 2 to the result.
Or, do the work inside the parentheses FIRST: 3 1/2+( 2+4 1/2).
This simplifies the problem to 3 1/2+( 6 1/2).
You MUST get the same answer either way.
3 1/2+( 2+4 1/2).
There are at least two ways in which you could do this problem. One would be to simply drop the parentheses entirely:
3 1/2+ 2+4 1/2 It'd make sense to add 3 1/2 and 4 1/2 together FIRST, and then to add 2 to the result.
Or, do the work inside the parentheses FIRST: 3 1/2+( 2+4 1/2).
This simplifies the problem to 3 1/2+( 6 1/2).
You MUST get the same answer either way.
Step-by-step explanation:
This problem bothers on the use of mathematical properties
Given the expression
3 1/2+( 2+4 1/2)
Applying the associative property rule which says we can add or multiply regardless of how numbers are grouped
Associative property
3 1/2+( 2+4 1/2) can re re-written as
(3 1/2+2) +4 1/2
Commutative property
This rule states that the we can move (commute) figures about and still get same result.
Hence 3 1/2+( 2+4 1/2) can also be expressed as (2+4 1/2+3 1/2)
Or (4 1/2 +2+ 3 1/2)