Answer:
This question´s answer would be more a matter of opinion, and it depends entirely on the way that the answerer looks at it.
The first thing to be taken into account is that the federal system that was adopted by the United States, and which was acceptable to its citizens, has a series of laws, both in the federal government, and the state governments, that help guide how life in the country runs. In essence, Americans have, throughout history, accepted the federal system, and they insisted that state governments had to be equally, if not more, powerful than the national government, and in order for the two of them to work together, there had to be laws and rules. It was the American public who chose to accept the ideals of check and balances, which instituted laws for both the national and state governments
So, given this position, I would say that it is fair for a local business owner to be caught between the laws of the state and federal government, because this is the system that was accepted from the start, and these rules and regulations have been created to ensure that this business owner´s rights, and responsibilities, are safeguarded by both the state and federal government. More than that, they ensure stability for that local business owner and give him the chance to carry out his business even beyond the local limits of where he is.
