Which of the following statements about the Gault case is NOT true? A. It changed the rights of juveniles in American courts. B. It involved a child who was arrested for making prank phone calls. C. At the child’s original hearing, the child had an attorney. D. The child's parents were not notified when the child was brought into custody.

the answer is (b) it was landmark decision which finally gave Juveniles the same due processes of adults. The U.S. Supreme Court made this decision in 1967, a 15 year-old accused of making an obscene telephone call to a neighbor.

Answer Link

francocanacari francocanacari · Answer 2 · 2019-06-10T13:16:02+02:00

Answer:

The correct answer is C. It is not true that, at the child's original hearing, the child had an attorney.

Explanation:

In this case, a 15-year-old boy, Gerry Gault, of Arizona, was accused in the summer of 1964 of making indecent calls to a neighbor and as a result of an investigation in which he was not informed of any rights, his parents were not notified by the police (the sheriff of the Gila County) of his detention and other similar practices, proper to the tutelary right, his internment was ordered in a correctional facility (the Industrial School of the State) until he was 21 years old). An adult convicted of the same act could have been sentenced to a $ 50 fine or two months in prison.

As a consequence of this injustice, the Supreme Court ruled that every child accused of a crime has the same rights as the Fourteenth Amendment recognized adults, due process, silence, right to defense and the right to appeal judicial decisions.