Respuesta :
their claim about cheating existing in high-incentive situations
the facts they present about sumo and the bagel business
their use of statistical evidence
their use of different examples (sumo and bagels) in their evidence
their overall use of inductive reasoning to arrive at a generalization about morality
Levitt and Dubner's argument employs concrete, logical data to reach moral conclusions and cheating behaviors.
How effective is the use of logic and evidence?
As evidenced by the facts they offer regarding sumo and the bagel business, they claim that cheating occurs in high-incentive settings. Their evidence included statistical evidence as well as several examples (sumo and bagels). As a result, their total use of inductive reasoning to arrive at a moral generalization.
For more information about the logic, refer below
https://brainly.com/question/8268443
