A historian is making a historical argument about the French Revolution. He notes that, following the Revolution, a rash of violence swept over France. He refers to the execution of French royalty and the European wars that revolutionaries launched following their victory to support his argument. In his opinion, it is morally wrong for any political movement to use violence to achieve its goals. Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones. Which part of the historian's argument references specific examples of historical evidence?

The correct answer should be the execution of French royalty. That is not just a broad thing but rather something that specifically happened as there were many of the French royalty who were executed in public. Specific evidence are also the wars that followed out of it because they wouldn't happen had the King still been there.

Answer Link

jayilych4real jayilych4real · Answer 2 · 2022-07-07T11:41:59+02:00

The part of the historian's argument that references specific examples of historical evidence is D. Based on this information, he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.

What is a Historical Evidence?

This refers to the use of historical sources in order to make a claim or argument about something.

Hence, we can see that based on the given description, we are told that a historian is making an argument about the French Revolution and he talks about the violence that follows, and we can see that he argues that the French Revolution produced far more negative outcomes than positive ones.

Read more about French Revolution here:

https://brainly.com/question/6665402

#SPJ5