Respuesta :
Answer:
Colonial America:
In the early colonial period, voting rights in America were often restricted to white male property owners. However, the specifics varied by colony, with some allowing more inclusive suffrage than others. In contrast, in England during this time, voting rights were extremely limited and generally restricted to wealthy landowners and aristocrats.
Expansion of Suffrage:
Over time, both countries saw expansions of suffrage. In the United States, the franchise gradually expanded to include non-property-owning white males, then African American males after the Civil War, and eventually women with the passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920. In England, the franchise expanded with the Reform Acts of the 19th and early 20th centuries, which gradually extended the vote to more men and, eventually, to women over 30 with the Representation of the People Act 1918, and then to all women over 21 with the Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act 1928.
Representation:
The structure of representation also differed between the two countries. In America, the electoral system has typically been based on a federal model, with separate state-based elections for various offices, including the President. In England, the electoral system is more centralized, with Members of Parliament representing constituencies in the House of Commons.
Federalism vs. Unitary System:
America's federal system means that states have considerable autonomy in determining their own voting laws, leading to some variations in voting rights across states. In contrast, England operates under a unitary system, where voting laws are generally uniform across the country.on:
