Answer:
False.
Explanation:
A systematic review of evidence from qualitative studies is not the same as a meta-analysis.
A systematic review involves the use of a systematic and transparent approach to search, select, and evaluate studies that meet predetermined criteria. The goal is to synthesize knowledge from a range of studies to understand a particular phenomenon or issue.
A meta-analysis, on the other hand, is a statistical analysis of the results from multiple studies that investigate the same research question. It combines the results from these studies in order to calculate a overall effect size of the intervention or phenomenon being studied.
While both systematic reviews and meta-analyses aim to synthesize evidence to better understand a research question, they differ in their methodology and the types of studies that are included.
