In 1930 Mohandas "Mahatma" Gandhi led a nonviolent march in India protesting Britain's colonial monopoly on and taxation of an essential resource: salt. The Salt March, as it came to be known, was a triggering moment for the larger civil disobedience movement that eventually won India independence from Britain in 1947. Shortly before the Salt March, Gandhi had written to Viceroy Lord Irwin, the representative of the British crown in India. The passage below is the conclusion of that letter. Read the passage carefully. Then, in a well-written essay, analyze the rhetorical choices Gandhi makes to present his case to Lord Irwin. I know that in embarking on non-violence, I shall be running what might fairly be termed a mad risk.
But the victories of truth have never been won
Une without risks, often of the gravest character.
3 Conversion of a nation that has consciously or unconsciously preyed upon another, far more numerous, far more ancient, and no less cultured than itsell,
is worth any amount of nsk
[have deliberately used the word conversion. For
10 my ambition is no less than to convert the British people through non-violence, and thus to make them see the wrong they have done to India. I do not seck to harm your poople. I want to serve them even as I want lo serve my own. I believe that I have always
15 served them.
I served them up to 1919, blindly. But when my cyes were opened and I conceived non-co-operation. the object still was to serve them. I employed the same weapon that Thave, in all humility, successfully 20 used against the dearest members of my family. If. have equal love for your people with mine. it will not long remain hidden. It will be acknowledged by them. even as the members of my famiy acknowledged. after they had tried me for soveral years. If the people
125
Join me, as l expoct they will, the sutterings they will undergo, unless the British nation sooner retraces its steps, will be enough to melt the stoniest hearts.
The plan through civil disobedience will be to combat such evils as Thave sampled out. Il we want
P. lo sever the British connection it is hecause of sueh
evils. When they are removed, the path becomes easy Then the way to friendly negotiation will be open. Il the British commerce with India is purified of greed. you will have no difticulty in recognizins que independence. I invite you then to pave the way for
immediate removal of those evils. and thus open a
way for a real conference between equals, interested only is promoting the common good of mankind through voluntary fellowship and in arranging terms of mutual help and commerce equally suited to both.
You have unnecessarily laid stress upon communa. problems that unhappily affect this land. Important though they undoubtedly are for the consideration of any scheme of Government they have little bearing
45
on the greater problems which are above communitics and which aftoct them all equally. But if you cannot see your way to deal with these evils and my letter makes no appeal to your heart, on the eleventh day of this month. I shall proceed with such co-workers of the Ashram' as I can take, to disregard the provisions of the salt laws. I regard this tax to be the most iniquitous of all from the poor man's standpoint.
As the independence movement is essentially for the poorest in the land, the beginning will be made with this evil. The wonder is that we have submitted to the cruel monopoly for so long. It is. I know, open to you to frustrate my design by arresting me. I hope that there will be tens of thousands ready, in a disciplined manner, to take up the work after me, and, in the act of disobeying the Salt Act", to lay themselves open to the penalties of a law that should never have disfigured the statute book.
I have no desire to cause you unnecessil embarrassment, or any at all, so far as I can help. Il you think that there is any substance in my letter. and
If you will care to discuss matters with me. and if to that end you would like me to postpone publication of this letter. I shall gladly refrain on reccipt of a telegram to that effect soon after this reaches you You will, however, do me the lavour not to deflect me from my course, unless you can soe your way to contom to the substance of this letter
This letter is not in any way intended as a threat, but is a simple and sacred duty. peremptory on a civil resister. Thercforc, I am having it spocially delivered by a young English friend who believes in the Indian cause and is a full believer in non-violence and whom
Providence seems to have sent to me. as it were. for the very purpose

Respuesta :

In his letter to Viceroy Lord Irwin, Gandhi uses various rhetorical strategies to make his case persuasively.

Firstly, he establishes his credibility and sincerity by acknowledging the risk of his nonviolent approach, showing his commitment to his principles and building trust.

Secondly, Gandhi appeals to emotions and shared values by emphasizing the common humanity between Indians and British people. He frames his actions as a means to "convert" the British through nonviolence and make them recognize the injustices inflicted upon India, appealing to the moral conscience of the viceroy and the British nation.

Moreover, Gandhi presents logical arguments to support his position, highlighting the iniquity of the salt tax and offering a practical solution for resolution and negotiation.

Additionally, Gandhi's use of imagery evokes powerful mental images to reinforce his message and the potential consequences of inaction.

Furthermore, Gandhi maintains a respectful and diplomatic tone throughout the letter, addressing Lord Irwin with courtesy and expressing his willingness to engage in dialogue and cooperation.

In conclusion, Gandhi strategically employs ethos, pathos, logos, imagery, and tone to effectively convey his message to Lord Irwin, appealing to shared values, reason, and emotion in pursuit of his goal of Indian independence through nonviolent means.