The statement "OH. habilis was relatively small in stature compared to H. erectus" is true. Here's why:
1. Homo habilis was indeed smaller in size compared to Homo erectus. Homo habilis had a smaller brain size and stature. They were more ape-like in appearance and had a cranial capacity of around 510 to 660 cm³, while Homo erectus had a larger brain size and a cranial capacity of around 900 to 1100 cm³.
2. The size difference between Homo habilis and Homo erectus reflects an evolutionary change over time. Homo habilis is considered one of the earliest species in the Homo genus, while Homo erectus came later in the evolutionary timeline.
3. The physical differences in size between Homo habilis and Homo erectus are indicative of changes and adaptations in hominin species over time, showing a progression in brain size, body size, and technological advancements.
In summary, Homo habilis being relatively small in stature compared to Homo erectus is a true statement based on their anatomical differences and evolutionary history.
