Respuesta :
• Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know?
This is a matter of civil law because the woman didn’t have him sign an official agreement so she doesn’t have proof. They will have to fix the problem in civil court.
• Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer.
This law was created to protect people’s rights, because as you can see she signed ownership over to him and now the law is just going to protect the fact that the car is his now, plus she didn’t have him sign any document to make sure that he had to pay.
• Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? Use details from the scenario to support your answer.
Personally, I think she does not have a valid argument because she never did an agreement for him to sign so she can’t present her case without any proof that the car wasn’t a gift.
im doing the same project but i dont know the 2nd qustion... let me know if you figure it out