Respuesta :
Social Darwinism really ought to be called "Spencerism," after Herbert Spencer, who began such thoughts. Spencer and Charles Darwin were rivals, not allies. The term "survival of the fittest" is actually a Spencer term, which he applied to human beings. (Darwin used the term "natural selection" in reference to biological species.) The ideas of what came to be known as "Social Darwinism" is that some people are just better and more fit to succeed than other, so they ought to succeed and rule over the less-talented members of the human species (like poor people). Industry titans (sometimes referred to as "robber barons") used the ideas of Social Darwinism to justify their dominating ways over common laborers.
Answer:
a. The writer expresses a point of view within his writing that pushes the idea that money is not bad and the rich are not always evil and greedy. He brings recognition to how some people come from poverty and work extremely hard to achieve wealth, and though they have not changed as an individual, members of society start to change their opinion and view of them. The writer seems to disagree with this common view of the rich and the Gilded Age as a whole, rather implying wealth is well earned. b. Social Darwinism goes hand in hand with the concept of natural selection. It was used to justify conservatism, racism, and imperialism in order to discourage thoughts and/or plans of reform. The theory of Social Darwinism relates to the views presented in this document because William Graham Sumner implies that people are against the events going on in the time period of the Gilded Age. Sumner's document was most likely written to try to discourage any ideas of intervention or reformation, while simultaneously justifying the overly wealthy . C. The Panic of 1873 was primarily caused by the abundance of investments in railroads. While the Gilded Age progressed, so did the investments in railroads. Over-expansion in the industry and these railroads caused a financial crisis that triggered economic depression lasting until 1877. This is an argument to refute the views within Sumner's document, because though he acted like everything was going to be alright and there was no need for reform, the Panic of 1873 was a consequence.
Explanation: