Respuesta :
The answer is: During the Duncan vs Louisiana case, the Supreme Court answered whether the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a jury trial applies to the states or not.
The Duncan Vs Louisiana was a very significant ruling by the Supreme Court and it incorporated the 6th Amendement right to a jury trial in all States.
The case took place in 1968 during the time of huge racial tensions. Gary Duncan was the name of a 19 year old teenage African-American boy who was charged with battery in the State of Louisiana without a jury trial.
With an appeal, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Duncan 7-2 and ensuring that every person has the right to a jury trial.
1968 Duncan v. Louisiana demanded the Supreme Court to ascertain whether a state could refuse someone the freedom to a claim by jury. The Supreme Court found that a person afflicted with sedate criminal malfeasance is confirmed a tribunal trial supported by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.
Further Explanation:
Duncan v. Louisiana petitioned the Supreme Court to ascertain whether a state could refuse anyone right to a hearing by jury. The resolution declared that not all criminal aggression is "severe" sufficiently to demand a tribunal trial supported the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Court legislated it apparently that insignificant attacks did not demand a lawsuit by jury, supporting the popular traditional law practice of applying a tribunal hearing to arbitrate petty crimes. The Justices concluded that there was neither "strong indication" that the Composers of the Constitution intended to guarantee the right to a hearing by judges for small charges. To segregate a "severe crime" from a "small crime," the court observed to District of Columbia v. Clawans. In such a case, the court used scientific standards and concentrated on the current laws and methods in national courts to ascertain whether an insignificant attack demanded a jury trial. In Duncan v. Louisiana, the majority assessed models in the national tribunals, state tribunals, and American constitutional practices of 18th century to command that a crime condemned by up to two years in penitentiary could not be charged a small malfeasance.
Learn more:
1. What was the status of us workplace safety laws in 1900? https://brainly.com/question/1233502
2. Problem on the establishment clause. https://brainly.com/question/10628112
Answer Details:
Grade: High School
Subject: History
Chapter: Duncan Vs Louisiana Case
Keywords:
Duncan, lawsuit , legislated, Columbia, district , model , crime , guarantee, criminal , tribunal , practice judge.
