State lawmakers are considering overturning a law that forbids the sale of lottery tickets on Sundays. Proponents of the bill claim that the reason for the potential change is a result of consumer demand. These "state leaders” clearly have no concept of how to maintain family values. Playing the lottery is just as despicable as gambling in a casino and should be outlawed altogether.

Which detail reveals the writer’s purpose?

Using first-person pronouns shows that the writer has strong opinions against the lottery.
Placing “state leaders” in quotation marks indicates that the writer is mocking the lawmakers.
Stating the reason for the bill highlights the writer’s anger over the potential change.
Comparing the lottery to gambling establishes factual evidence to back the writer’s opinion.

Option A refers to first person pronouns. But there is no use of first-person pronouns. So, this option is incorrect. Option C refers to the anger of the speaker which is incorrect. There is no factual evidence in comparing lottery to gambling as given in Option D. So, the correct option is Option B.

By placing state leaders in quotation, speaker shows that he is not happy with the decision of cancelling the law of not selling lottery tickets on Sundays.