Explanation:
[tex]1.2 \mathrm{N} ; 2 \mathrm{N}[/tex]
2.[tex]200 \mathrm{N} ; 200 \mathrm{N}[/tex]
4.[tex]2 \mathrm{N} ; 2 \mathrm{N} ; 4 \mathrm{N}[/tex]
[tex]5.2 \mathrm{N} ; 2 \mathrm{N} ; 2 \mathrm{N}[/tex]
[tex]6.2 \mathrm{N} ; 2 \mathrm{N} ; 3 \mathrm{N}[/tex]
[tex]8.200 \mathrm{N} ; 200 \mathrm{N} ; 5 \mathrm{N}[/tex]
In only the above cases (i.e 1,2,4,5,6,8 ) the object possibly moves at a constant velocity of [tex]256 \mathrm{m} / \mathrm{s}[/tex]
You should have noticed that the sets of forces applied to the object are the same asthe ones in the prevous question. Newton's 1st law (and the 2nd law, too) makes nodistinction between the state of re st and the state of moving at a constant velocity(even a high velocity).
In both cases, the net force applied to the object must equal zero.
