Based on the information above, the main argument of this paper is that violent video games should be banned for teenagers because they have negative effects on their behavior.
What statements stand out from the excerpts?
The excerpts focus on two main arguments which are:
- Teens who play violent video games are more aggressive.
- Teens who play violent video games tend to have more fights with their friends and family.
According to the above, the claims and arguments would be as follows:
- Claim: banning violence from teens’ video games because violent video games are harmful
- Reason 1: Violent video games may have negative effects on the academic performance of adolescent students
- Support for Reason 1: In studies conducted by neuroscientists, it was found that teens who regularly play violent video games have lower rates of success in school than teens who do not play violent video games.
- Reason 2: The interpersonal relationships of adolescents who play violent video games are negatively affected because their behavior tends to be more aggressive with the people around them.
- Support for Reason 2: Studies have consistently shown that teens who play violent video games on a regular basis are more aggressive with peers than teens who do not play these games.
- Counterclaim: In some cases, people tend to believe that violent video games do not influence their behavior.
- Rebuttal Support: However, it has been shown in several scientific studies that adolescents who play violent video games change their behavior, are more aggressive and often fight with people close to them.
- Conclusion Clincher: According to the above, it can be concluded that parents should be aware of the practices of their children, especially adolescents, because during this age they can access violent content that will negatively influence their behavior.
Learn more about claims in: https://brainly.com/question/22898077
#SPJ1
