In order to demonstrate that a story was false, made up, or published with actual malice, libel plaintiffs frequently need to know the names of the sources that journalists used to prepare a story.
Being libel-proof simply implies that the plaintiff's image is so poor that any false statement also couldn't further damage that person's standing in the community. The reasoning for this is that a plaintiff's claim must be rejected because there was no injury caused by the misleading statement to the plaintiff.
Because there are various legal requirements for various sorts of plaintiffs, the status of the plaintiff (the person filing a complaint) is significant in defamation law. Depending if the defamation claimant is a private or public figure, the legal norm changes.
Learn more about libel plaintiffs: https://brainly.com/question/29409476
#SPJ4